Site icon Ananova Business Web Hosting

Prevents Federal entities’ Use Of Facial Recognition Tools

Oregon's U.S. Senator Jeff Merkley, along with U.S. Senator Edward J. Markey (D-MA) and Representatives Pramila Jayapal (D-WA-07), Ayanna Pressley (D-MA-07), Rashida Tlaib (D-MI-13), and Katherine Clark (D-MA-05), announced the introduction of bicameral legislation to stop government use of biometric technology, including facial recognition tools. The legislation prevents federal entities' use of facial recognition tools and strips federal support for state and local law enforcement entities that use biometric technology.

A growing body of research points to systematic inaccuracy and bias issues in biometric technologies, which pose disproportionate risks to non-white individuals. A recent report by the National Institute of Standards and Technology on facial recognition tools found that Black, Brown, and Asian individuals were up to 100 times more likely to be misidentified than white male faces.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) amplified the story of Robert Williams, a Black man from the Detroit area wrongfully arrested after facial recognition technology misidentified him as the man who was seen allegedly committing a crime on a store's surveillance camera feed.

The Facial Recognition and Biometric Technology Moratorium Act responds to reports that federal and local law enforcement entities have engaged with facial recognition companies and follows recent pledges by leading technology companies to pause their sale of facial recognition tools to law enforcement.

Senator Merkley said: “When Americans are demanding that we address systemic racism in law enforcement, the use of facial recognition technology is a step in the wrong direction. Studies show that this technology brings racial discrimination and bias. This technology is not ready for a prime time between the risks of sliding into a surveillance state we can't escape from and the dangers of perpetuating discrimination. The federal government must ban facial recognition until we have confidence that it doesn't exacerbate racism and violate American citizens' privacy.”

Specifically, the Facial Recognition and Biometric Technology Moratorium Act of 2020 would:

The ACLU, Electronic Frontier Foundation endorses the legislation, Fight for the Future, Color of Change, MediaJustice, Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), Free Press, Jewish Voice for Peace, MPower Change, the Athena Coalition, Project on Government Oversight, Georgetown University Law Center's Center on Privacy & Technology, and New America's Open Technology Institute.

The introduction is the most recent step by Merkley pertaining to facial recognition technology. Previously, Merkley pressed the CEO of CLEAR, a biometric identification company, for details regarding what privacy practices and precautions are being undertaken for a new product being marketed to businesses to screen their employees and consumers for the coronavirus. In addition, Merkley teamed up with Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ) to introduce the Ethical Use of Facial Recognition Act.

Evan Greer, Deputy Director, Fight for the Future said: “Facial recognition is a uniquely dangerous form of surveillance. It is not just some Orwellian technology of the future –– it's being used by law enforcement agencies across the country right now and harms communities right now. Facial recognition is the perfect technology for tyranny. It automates discriminatory policing and exacerbates existing injustices in our deeply racist criminal justice system. This legislation effectively bans law enforcement use of facial recognition in the United States. That's exactly what we need right now. We give this bill our full endorsement.”

Brandi Collins-Dexter, Senior Campaign Director, Color of Change said: “For Black communities, surveillance is not safe. We endorse Senator Markey and Representative Pressley's proposed ban on facial recognition technology because it recognizes the bias baked into its coding. Especially in the hands of the police, it is a dangerous surveillance tool. By leveraging federal grants, this legislation will help move state and local governments to pass their prohibitions on discriminatory policing technology. Ultimately, facial recognition software will always heighten the tremendous attacks that Black communities already face from law enforcement. We support this bill as a critical step toward a society where our communities can live without surveillance.”

Caitriona Fitzgerald, Interim Associate Director and Policy Director, EPIC, said: “The use of face surveillance technology needs to end. Face surveillance violates Americans' right to privacy, treats all individuals as suspicious, and threatens First Amendment-protected rights. The technology has been shown repeatedly to be biased and inaccurate, frequently misidentifying people of color. EPIC has repeatedly called for a moratorium on face surveillance and the Facial Recognition and Biometric Technology Moratorium Act of 2020 would stop the use of this dangerous technology. EPIC is proud to support it.”

Neema Singh Guliani, Senior Legislative Counsel, ACLU, said: “No one should have to go through what the Williams family has gone through. It's past time Congress halted face recognition and stopped federal money from being used to invest in invasive and discriminatory surveillance.”

Jake Laperruque, Senior Counsel, Project On Government Oversight said: “Facial recognition has caused improper arrests, been used to retaliate against peaceful protesters, and is more likely to misidentify people of color. We need to press pause on unchecked use of this dangerous technology, and that's exactly what the Facial Recognition and Biometric Technology Moratorium Awhich'so.”

Lauren Sarkesian, Senior Policy Counsel, New America's Open Technology Institute said: “The Facial Recognition and Biometric Technology Moratorium Act of 2020 takes a much-needed step to halt the use of dangerous facial recognition technology by law enforcement, which disproportionately impacts Black and Brown communities and is prone to misuse. In the past couple of weeks, three major companies that develop and sell the technology have disbanded their sales to law enforcement, acknowledging the bias and civil rights issues it presents. Yesterday's news of Robert Williams's wrongful arrest further demonstrates the devastating consequences that can follow when this biased technology used by law enforcement. Congress should not delay any further in halting government use of this technology.”

Myaisha, Campaign Director, MediaJustice, said: “As the world continues to reel from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, Black and brown protesters are literally risking their lives to protest against police violence in the wake of the murders of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and countless others. In response, the police have escalated their violence toward protesters with tear gases, rubber bullets, and surveillance tools, like facial recognition, to target, track and arrest protesters. This technology has been proven to be inaccurate when identifying black women's faces, people of color, and gender non-conforming individuals. This technology is uniquely dangerous and actually puts our lives at further risk of brutality and violence. We need to reinvest our resources and priorities into meeting our community's needs and not invest in dangerous surveillance tools like facial recognition. This legislation, which effectively bans the use of facial recognition, is exactly what we need. We are proud to support this.”

Source: Press Release
Date: Friday, June 26, 2020
merkley.senate.gov


Exit mobile version